Archive for the ‘General News’ Category

New Chief Justice Of The Federal Court Of Australia

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

The Australian Government is pleased to announce the appointment of the Honourable Patrick Keane as Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia.

Justice Keane will begin his appointment on Monday 22 March 2010. His Honour will be the third Chief Justice appointed to the Federal Court since its inception, and the first from Queensland.

Justice Keane is currently a Judge of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Queensland, an office he has held with distinction since 2005. Prior to taking up judicial appointment, Justice Keane was Solicitor-General for Queensland. Between 1990 and 1992, Justice Keane was Deputy Chairman of the Queensland Law Reform Commission.  He practised at the Queensland Bar between 1978 and 2005, principally in commercial and constitutional matters. Justice Keane was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 1988 and in 2003 was awarded the Centenary Medal.

Consistent with a commitment to a more transparent and merit-based judicial appointments process the Government has undertaken extensive consultation to ensure the selection of the best possible candidate.  The Government sought the views of a wide range of individuals and organisations, including State and Territory Attorneys-General, Chief Justices from across Australia, and the legal profession through the relevant professional associations.

The Government is grateful to all those who put forward nominations, which greatly assisted in the consideration of this appointment.

The Honourable Chief Justice Michael Black AC will retire on 21 March 2010, following 19 years of exemplary service to Australia as Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia. 

The Government thanks the Chief Justice for the valued and enduring contribution he has made to Australia’s justice system.

 

Canberra

10 February 2010

Press Office (02) 6277 7744

Attorney-General’s Office (02) 6277 7300

New Supreme Court Judge Appointed

Monday, July 27th, 2009

Campbel Giles | 23 July 2009

Media Release

The Attorney-General, Delia Lawrie, today announced the appointment of Judith Kelly SC to the Northern Territory’s Supreme Court bench.

“Ms Kelly brings a wealth of commercial legal experience and a strong understanding of matters unique to the Territory to the bench,” Ms Lawrie said.

“With 23 years experience as a legal practitioner in the Territory, Ms Kelly will be a valuable asset to the Supreme Court.”

Ms Kelly has extensive experience in high-level commercial litigation and was appointed Senior Counsel in 2008.

“I want to congratulate Ms Kelly on her appointment as a Justice of the Supreme Court. She will make a significant contribution to the Northern Territory’s judicial system,” Ms Lawrie said.

Ms Kelly’s appointment follows the retirement of Justice Sally Thomas from the Supreme Court bench.

“I would like to thank Justice Thomas for her valued contribution as both Chief Magistrate for six years and to the Supreme Court over the past 17 years,” Ms Lawrie said.

Biography

Judith Kelly came to the Territory in 1977 and worked as a secondary school teacher at Batchelor Area School from 1977 to 1982.

She completed her law degree in Brisbane in 1985 and was admitted to practise as a barrister in Queensland in February 1986 and as a legal practitioner in the Northern Territory on April 1, 1986.

She began work for the Darwin office of Morris Fletcher & Cross, (later Philip & Mitaros, now Clayton Utz) where she became a partner.

As a solicitor Judith Kelly had a commercial litigation practise with a focus on banking and insolvency, insurance, construction and admiralty law.

After joining William Forster Chambers in 1996 she retained a commercial focus practising mainly in the areas of contract, partnership, building, property, tax and insolvency matters as well as some professional negligence, insurance, native title, administrative law, maritime, probate and family provision matters.

She is married with one son. Judith Kelly has long-standing family connections to the Territory with her grandfather, Harold Snell, arriving in 1912 to build Commonwealth public servant’s houses at Myilly Point while her mother was born in the old Darwin hospital at Doctors Gully in 1923.

Women Barristers Sidelined as Men clean up

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Nicola Berkovic | June 12, 2009

Article from:  The Australian

MALE barristers are taking the lion’s share of government work in the nation’s most lucrative market for legal services — NSW.

NSW government figures obtained by The Australian show women received just 26 per cent of the state government’s briefs and 17 per cent of fees generated in October to December last year.

The inequality was even more pronounced at the senior level, where females received just 16 per cent of briefs to silks and 12 per cent of fees.

The figures were released as the Law Council of Australia and Australian Women Lawyers kicked off the first comprehensive national survey to test the representation of female barristers in superior courts across the country. The NSW data showed the state fell well behind Victoria, where female barristers worked on 52 per cent of state government briefs but received just 28 per cent of the fees generated.

A spokesman for NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said the state’s equitable briefing policy was introduced in October to address the difference.

He said it was aimed at encouraging government agencies to provide more work to female barristers and to boost their numbers at the bar.

AWL president Georgia McMaster said it was disappointing that in NSW as in Victoria, women received a disproportionate amount of fees for the work they did.

“(It) means they are basically getting the lowest type of bar work and are receiving less fees than their male counterparts,” she said.

Ms McMaster said the survey announced this week would show at a national level whether governments and large firms with equal briefing policies were providing enough high-level work to female barristers.

Ultimately, the aim was to ensure females were better represented at the bar.

“A lot of women barristers come in at the junior level and stay for three to five years and then they go again because they’re not getting the work,” she said.

“Until they start getting a really good proportion of the work, we’re not going to build up the numbers.”

Law Council president John Corcoran said the survey, due to be completed in September, would probe the number and complexity of cases in which female lawyers appear.

Data will be collected on the rate at which females appear in court, the types of matters they are involved in and the time spent in court.

Judges’ associates at the High Court, Federal Court, Family Court and the Supreme Courts and Courts of Appeal in each state and territory will complete the surveys and assess the complexity of cases.

Mr Corcoran said there was widespread concern that female barristers were under-represented across the nation.

However, this was based largely on anecdotal evidence. For the first time, the survey would gather data from every superior court to gain a clear picture of national briefing practices.

The survey, which was being conducted by independent consultants at considerable cost to the Law Council, would analyse whether females were being given a fair share of briefs.

This would help to determine whether new strategies were needed to ensure equality for women at the bar.

“We’re hoping with the survey results that this can be brought to the attention of the government who are major litigants,” he said.

The survey follows a national but less comprehensive AWL survey completed in 2006, which showed females accounted for just 20 per cent of court representations.